a bible, theology, politics, news, networking, and discussion site
What do you guys think of this? Does it take away something from manly character to raise your hands with eyes closed and head held back while worshiping the Lord?
While we're on the subject, what did you all think of Tim's piece on Parchment and Pen, The Crazy Worship Lady?
Tags: Men, braveheart, sissies, worship
Permalink Reply by Tim on April 3, 2011 at 10:58am So you're saying all the men are too smart to listen to Jeremy Camp.
Tim said:
CHAR! You shouldn't talk about females like that. ;)
Permalink Reply by Jnorm on April 3, 2011 at 11:46am I think the basic premise that modern "feminine" worship is to blame for less men being involved in the church is questionable. This assumes that men used to be more involved in the church prior. However, due to pride or inability to be part of a community or for some other reason, historically men have been less active in the church. Even from the beginning, a common pagan criticism of Christianity was that it was full of women and slaves. The problem with men is men, not swooning, dancing or any other excuse an undisciplined mind will find to distract itself during worship.
Permalink Reply by Char on April 3, 2011 at 11:51am No. I was turning it around and making "poor ignorant things" = females. :D One snide comment deserves another. :D (Thanks God he's not in Char's reach ;) )
Permalink Reply by Tim on April 3, 2011 at 2:32pm That would be true IF “poor ignorant things” carried the same connotation that you gave it. But did I say that title had anything to do with Jeremy Camp? ;) I was reinterpreting to fit my feminology (i.e., systematic feminology).
Or are you saying they perversely and knowingly revel in their lameness?
Yes! (especially Canadians). ;)
Char said:
And since ignorance is the necessary condition for liking Jeremy Camp, either females are the ones who like Jeremy Camp, or they're not ignorant. Can't really have it two ways there.
Or are you saying they perversely and knowingly revel in their lameness?
Tim said:
No. I was turning it around and making "poor ignorant things" = females. :D One snide comment deserves another. :D (Thanks God he's not in Char's reach ;) )
Permalink Reply by Levi Gray on April 4, 2011 at 8:19am : eyes closed, head back, hands limply raised, body swaying…
Flee the evil desires of youth and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace, along with those who call on the Lord out of a pure heart. Don’t have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels. -2 Timothy 2:22
Permalink Reply by Char on April 4, 2011 at 8:34am You didn't deny it. And as you answered, you accepted the basic premise-admitting that the lame people who like Jeremy Camp are women. This requires the liking of Jeremy Camp to be lame.
Plus the premise is axiomatic. You can reinterpret the truth all you like, doesn't make it less true.
Tim said:
That would be true IF “poor ignorant things” carried the same connotation that you gave it. But did I say that title had anything to do with Jeremy Camp? ;) I was reinterpreting to fit my feminology (i.e., systematic feminology).
Permalink Reply by Otsukafan on April 4, 2011 at 11:03am I think this article is educational for anyone.
http://www.pravoslavie.ru/english/42390.htm
Sample from the article:
In a time when churches of every description are faced with Vanishing Male Syndrome, men are showing up at Eastern Orthodox churches in numbers that, if not numerically impressive, are proportionately intriguing. This may be the only church which attracts and holds men in numbers equal to women. As Leon Podles wrote in his 1999 book, "The Church Impotent: The Feminization of Christianity," "The Orthodox are the only Christians who write basso profundo church music, or need to."
Rather than guess why this is, I emailed a hundred Orthodox men, most of whom joined the Church as adults. What do they think makes this church particularly attractive to men? Their responses, below, may spark some ideas for leaders in other churches, who are looking for ways to keep guys in the church.
Permalink Reply by bob johnson on April 4, 2011 at 12:39pm
Permalink Reply by Otsukafan on April 4, 2011 at 3:17pm speaking of ingnorance.....what the heck is chrismated supposed to mean?
Permalink Reply by Tim on April 4, 2011 at 4:20pm You didn't deny it. And as you answered, you accepted the basic premise-admitting that the lame people who like Jeremy Camp are women. This requires the liking of Jeremy Camp to be lame.
Plus the premise is axiomatic. You can reinterpret the truth all you like, doesn't make it less true.
Tim said:That would be true IF “poor ignorant things” carried the same connotation that you gave it. But did I say that title had anything to do with Jeremy Camp? ;) I was reinterpreting to fit my feminology (i.e., systematic feminology).
Blog Resources
Christian Answers For The New Age
Conversation Diary (catholic)
Continuationism.com (marv & scott)
Fr. Stephen (eastern orthodox)
KJV Only Debate (jason s.)
Lisa Robinson - TheoThoughts
National Catholic Register (catholic)
WDTPRS (catholic)
Theological Resources
Center for Reformed Study and Apologetics
Christian Classics Ethereal Library
Council of Biblical Manhood and Womenhood (complementarian)
The Center for Bibical Equality (Egalitarian)
Evangelical Theological Society
Reclaiming the Mind Ministries
Society of Evangelical Arminians
Church History
Christian Traditions
Apologetics
Bible Study
IVP New Testament Commentaries Online
Online Bible and Theology Education
Theology and Bible MP3s
263 Theology Questions and Answers
Theologica Chat Room
© 2013 Created by Michael Patton.
Powered by