a bible, theology, politics, news, networking, and discussion site
9 members
54 members
9 members
6 members
18 members
48 members
28 members
104 members
Replied Nov 10
Replied Nov 10
Replied Nov 9
Replied Oct 20
Replied Oct 20
Replied Oct 19
JL Vaughn has not received any gifts yet
Answers in Genesis and Larry Pierce... want to give Spurgeon’s sermons new life. ... Larry and his wife were able to update these sermons, not to change the meaning, but to make them more easily understood by modern readers.
Posted on February 26, 2009 at 5:35pm — 7 Comments
Posted on February 17, 2009 at 3:30pm —
Posted on November 30, 2008 at 8:29pm — 7 Comments
Jesus came out from the temple and was going away when His disciples came up to point out the temple buildings to Him. And He said to them, "Do you not see all these things? Truly I say to you, not one stone here will be left upon another, which will not be torn down." (Matt. 24:1-2)
As he was leaving the temple, one of his disciples said to him, "Look, Teacher! What massi… Continue
Posted on November 18, 2008 at 5:00pm — 39 Comments
Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, Saying, Where is he… Continue
Posted on November 11, 2008 at 11:15pm — 9 Comments
Theology
Reclaiming the Mind Ministries
Christian Classics Ethereal Library
Council of Biblical Manhood and Womenhood (complementarian)
The Center for Bibical Equality (Egalitarian)
Evangelical Theological Society
Society of Evangelical Arminians
Center for Reformed Study and Apologetics
Church History
Christian Traditions
Apologetics
Bible Study
IVP New Testament Commentaries Online
Online Bible and Theology Education
Theology and Bible MP3s
263 Theology Questions and Answers
Theologica Chat Rooms
© 2009 Created by Michael Patton on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
Comment Wall (53 comments)
You need to be a member of Theologica to add comments!
Join this Ning Network
Very busy here. I understand being busy.
I'm over loaded.
wink, wink.
Missing you around here.
Of course, real life gets in the way. It does with me......
Never the less, I enjoy talking with you when you're around.
I appreciate your gracious spirit.
I am, though, interested in talking to you a bit more about your "eschatology" (for lack of a better term). I also noticed that you're involved with the Church of Christ, and was curious as to what you teach there about the Gospel and who Jesus is. I was actually asked a couple years ago to come meet with a Church of Christ (I think they were called "en Eglesia") with a friend who was being tempted to join up, and I was actually asked to come and defend the doctrine of the Trinity (more specifically, the deity of Christ) against these people. How does your view of Jesus compare with theirs? Do you believe in baptismal regeneration? Do you believe that someone needs to be baptized more than once based on the sin in his/her life?
Some of these questions come from an ignorance based on what I've heard and would like to confirm/have denied. The other is because I am still learning about Preterism and would like to have a more full explanation from you.
Is that a fair trade?
Those things aside, the fact remains that there are far too many variables to make a conclusive decision about which author wrote what book based on internal evidence. I can't remember, did you say that John didn't write either his Gospel or the Revelation?
And, again, Paul's grammar is not a reliable source for making conclusive decisions either. You seem to be familiar with textual studies, so what makes you think that you can make conclusive statements based on conjecture? Paul used an amanuensis for writing his epistles, and the fact that scribes over the years would have been familiar with Paul's writings in the epistles they were familiar with likely would have given them reason to adapt the ones they were copying to match the grammar in those others. This tendency has also been recognized by Greek scholars.
Please, JL, I don't see this as a very profitable discussion. I don't know as much as I need to know to really answer the questions you have for me; though I plan to read and study more in the future. I'm more interested in talking about the Gospel or maybe even your eschatalogical view (or lack thereof).
Well, JL, if most commentators agree that John’s Gospel was written in much better Greek than the Greek in Revelation, it may be because of the something else that most commentators agree on—John’s Greek was bad. If you couple this with the fact that John was all by himself in exile on the island of Patmos when he wrote Revelation and the fact that he would have used an amanuensis when he dictated his Gospel, then you have one good possibility. I say possibility because we can’t be sure about things like this because we don’t have any clear proof one way or the other. Are you aware of any manuscripts that I'm not?
I was actually unaware of these supposed problems with John’s writings until you brought them up. I have heard of some claims to Aramaic authorship of Matthew and an even less reliable source claiming that Acts was written in Aramaic, but I have never heard about John’s writing having been written in anything other than Greek. It actually seems quite odd that someone would have claimed this especially because of John’s explanation of an Aramaic word for Greek readers if it was written in Aramaic (He brought him to Jesus. Jesus looked at him and said, “’So you are Simon the son of John? You shall be called Cephas’ (which means Peter)” (Joh 1:42 ESV).
By the way, you mention the “puns and word plays in the Aramaic versions.” Are you referring to the original writings or the modern translations?
My question for you is, why are you making this an issue?
As far as your questions about Paul’s epistles, he wouldn’t have been writing his own letters either. Many scholars and commentators would agree that Paul suffered from bad eyesight since his encounter with Christ which would’ve made writing his own letters an unnecessary difficulty when he had others who were glad to write them in his behalf.
I just asked my historical theology professor about your claims, and he confirmed to me that there is a debate about the original language used for the Gospels, but he said that it is “malarkey” (I like that word. Haha) for you to claim that Paul’s epistles have been without variation. Like I said before, he used an amanuensis to write his epistles, and they may have had different writing styles.
View All Comments